Daniel Evans vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Evans and Cerundolo compare on second serve points won in recent months? Evans has won 42.72%, while Cerundolo has secured 46.68% of second serve points.
• On return games, Evans has claimed 46.24% of opponents' second serve points, with Cerundolo achieving 48.69% under similar circumstances.
• Their effectiveness in returning first serves shows Evans at 26.58% and Cerundolo slightly ahead at 28.11%.
• When under pressure, Evans has saved 52.19% of breakpoints, compared to Cerundolo's 52.97% success rate. This could be crucial for match outcome predictions.
• Looking at their performance overview from the past year, Evans has won 49.12% of his matches, while Cerundolo boasts a stronger record with 65.17% wins.
• Analyzing surface preferences, Evans excels on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate, but struggles on clay with a 46% win rate. In contrast, Cerundolo is dominant on clay, winning 65% of matches, but hasn't recorded a win on indoor hard courts.
• At the Challenger/ITF level, Evans has won 46.43% of his matches in the past year, whereas Cerundolo has won 67.31%, indicating an edge in lower-tier events.
• Regarding the quality of opponents, Evans has faced players averaging a rank of 202.98, slightly higher than the average rank of 204.19 for Cerundolo's opponents.
• If considering a deciding set, Evans boasts a 58% success rate, but Cerundolo is more proficient, winning 67% of such sets on tour.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion, Evans leads with 38.42% of opportunities converted, while Cerundolo has a conversion rate of 36.32% recently.

Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):

Both players have shown strengths and weaknesses that could influence the outcome of this match. Cerundolo edges ahead in second serve performance and first serve returns, indicating a slight advantage in these key areas. Additionally, Cerundolo's higher match win percentage over the past year suggests more consistent success overall.

However, Evans performs marginally better in breakpoint conversions and proves to be a formidable opponent when matches extend to a deciding set. His superior second serve return statistics compared to Cerundolo's could also play a pivotal role in this encounter.

Cerundolo's impressive record on clay courts provides an edge, considering the surface-dependent nature of tennis performance. While both players have faced similar-level opponents, Cerundolo's higher win percentage in Challenger/ITF tournaments further tilts the scales in his favor.

Taking into account the presented data and surface dynamics, Cerundolo is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.